Zencoder vs Augment Code
Try
Enterprise AI Comparison

Zencoder vsAugment Code

Compare Zencoder's transparent daily limits with Augment Code's 200K context window. Two enterprise-focused approaches to AI coding assistance.

See ComparisonVisit Zencoder.ai

Key Differences

High-context AI meets high-capacity assistant - two different approaches

Context Window Size
Augment offers massive 200K token context window for understanding large codebases. Zencoder provides robust codebase indexing with practical limits
Pricing Model
Zencoder offers clear daily limits (280 calls/day). Augment uses credit-based system that varies by complexity - less predictable costs
Memory & Context
Augment features "Memories" that persist context across conversations. Zencoder provides session-based context with BYOK flexibility
Model Strategy
Augment uses intelligent multi-model routing with Claude Sonnet 3.7 and OpenAI o1. Zencoder offers Auto & Auto+ models with unlimited BYOK
Enterprise Security
Both are SOC 2 Type II certified. Augment adds ISO 42001 certification. Zencoder provides BYOK for maximum data control
Usage Transparency
Zencoder shows clear daily usage (280-4,200 calls). Augment's credit system reflects complexity but can be harder to predict monthly costs

Feature-by-Feature Analysis

Comprehensive comparison of capabilities and approach

Feature
Zencoder
Augment Code
Context Window
Standard
200K tokens
Pricing Model
Daily limits
Credit-based
Cost Transparency
Clear/predictable
Variable by complexity
Entry Price
$19/month Starter
$20/month Indie
Memory/Persistence
Session-based
Memories feature
Multi-Model Access
Auto & Auto+
Intelligent routing
BYOK (Bring Own Key)
Unlimited
AI Chat
AI Agents
Augment Agent included
Code Completion
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 42001
Context Engine
Advanced
Team Management

* Comparison based on publicly available information as of November 2025

Pricing Comparison

Transparent limits vs credit-based complexity

ZencoderClear Limits
$19/month
Starter plan with predictable costs
  • 280 premium calls/day (~8,400/month)
  • Predictable monthly costs
  • Auto & Auto+ AI models
  • Unlimited BYOK calls
  • 7-day free trial
  • Free tier: 30 calls/day

Best for: Developers who want predictable monthly costs and high daily capacity

Augment CodeCredit-Based
$20/month
Indie plan with 40,000 credits
  • 40,000 credits/month (Indie plan)
  • 2x context capacity vs competitors
  • Persistent learning memories
  • Claude Sonnet 3.7 + OpenAI o1
  • #1 on SWE-bench verify (65.4%)
  • SOC 2 Type II + ISO 42001

Best for: Enterprise teams with 100k+ file monorepos needing deep codebase understanding

Pricing Model Comparison

Zencoder: Simple & Predictable

  • • Clear daily limits you can track
  • • Same $19/mo regardless of usage pattern
  • • Know exactly what you'll pay
  • • BYOK for unlimited usage

Augment: Flexible but Complex

  • • Credits vary by prompt complexity
  • • Changed from message-based Oct 2025
  • • Can be hard to predict monthly costs
  • • May need to monitor credit usage

Which Should You Choose?

Different strengths for different needs

Choose Zencoder If:
  • You want predictable monthly costs
  • You need high daily capacity (8,400 calls/month)
  • You prefer bring-your-own-key flexibility
  • You want transparent pricing without credit tracking
  • You work across multiple smaller projects
Choose Augment Code If:
  • You work with large monorepos needing 200K context
  • You value persistent memories across sessions
  • You want automatic model routing for tasks
  • You need ISO 42001 certification
  • You're okay with credit-based pricing complexity

Try Both and Decide

Both offer enterprise-grade security and free tiers. Test each to see which approach fits your workflow.

Try Zencoder Free Try Augment Code